sexercizes:

zzabigailscissorhands:

megan-draws-stuff:

little-babytooth:

because your dashboard needs a merman.

yes it does thank you

Thank you kind citizen it needed tha

(via silvysartfulness)

aetalks:

blazegryph:

adelenedawner:

thegoddamazon:

the-herbal-alchemist:

liberalbutnotpartisan:

thedigitalfortress:

bitethismeowmix:

ludenberg:

mrowp:

Please don’t buy this system.

cant you just turn the camera around or put a blanket over it.

still a mic though 

and theres the chance that it might say something like “error kinect camera cannot function when obscured”

Videogame consoles are not supposed to spy on you.

Videogame consoles are not supposed to potentially rat you out to the government.

Videogame consoles are not supposed to arbitrarily decide who sees what’s on the screen and what’s not.

I have never told anyone not to buy a videogame console, but in this case, knowing what I know about the Xbox One, I am seriously imploring people not to buy this machine. The console will not be consumer-friendly, and between the above and an always-on internet connection, how do you know your hobby isn’t siphoning personal information to…well, who knows who?

Suffice it to say, the Xbox 360 will be my last Microsoft console. I don’t care how many more Halo games get churned out.

Adding this here from my videogame blog because it’s too important, and the potential for Microsoft to spy on us, then report findings to the government if asked…yeah, no.

Spread the word!

If you haven’t read George Orwell’s “1984”, do so.

Seriously.

So another reason for the Xbox One to never ever be used as anything more than a bookend?

Oh.

This doesn’t even mention the bullshittery of their policy that if you get banned from Xbox Live you also lose the licenses to all of your games, meaning you can’t even play them in single-player mode.

Or the bit where they’re making people sign away their rights to class-action suits to pre-order the thing, which is downright chilling.

And it keeps getting worse!

jfc I hope my little brother isn’t planning on wanting this crap. maybe I need to text my mother and warn them.

(via silvysartfulness)

(via silvysartfulness)

Princess Tutu

I can’t believe I haven’t posted a review of Princess Tutu yet. I should alleviate that problem…

View Post

ohshagnasty:

Is it wrong that I want to get schwasted with this 8-year-old?

chibi-knight:

ARE WE ALL GOING TO FORGET THE BEST FATHER OR WHAT

(via turianbadboy)

lesbiansofficial:

thatpointlessidiot:

magnezone:

krudman:

smilingemoticon:

itsvondell:

voldey:

Just when you thought it couldn’t get any worse. 

wow

is this a joke because i’m not laughing at all

I thought to myself when I saw this, “no. This has to be some one being silly. This has to be something some one fabricated to make microsoft look worse and people just aren’t checking the source.”

NOPE. IT’S REAL.

AND IT GOT WORSE:

WHAT.

remember when the basic fucking concept of a commodity was that buying something meant it was yours 

I want everyone to think long and hard on this information.

This means that you are not buying your games.  You are paying 60+ dollars to rent the games from Microsoft, and they can take their game back whenever they feel like it.

You will not own your game.  You will not own your console.  Essentially, Microsoft is saying “We can disable your games and cut you off from accessing your console whenever we choose to.”  Because a ban that locks your XBox Live account means that you will be locked out from all non-game functionality of the system, and by revoking your ‘licenses’ on all your games associated with your account, they can then disable each and every game you own for the system.  Leaving you with a five hundred dollar cable receiver.  Or, in the case of most users of the console, a five hundred dollar paperweight.

All because you accidentally walked into some online glitch and the rest of the players rage-report you for cheating.

This is unacceptable.  Buy any console but an XBox One.  Do not support Microsoft’s sudden belief that they own everything despite our purchase of it, and we have to prove we’re worthy of being shared with by paying exorbitant fees and jumping through constant hoops and hoping someone doesn’t report us for cheating because we made them mad in an online game.

Tell Microsoft ‘No,’ and do not give them your hard-earned money for what amounts to a video game subscription service with a $500 starting fee and $60+ dollar purchases.

There are way too many people that get banned unfairly. This is bullshit. I let my nephew play on my live account once when he was little, and I got a lot of people reporting me just because he was playing like a five year old. So. Cool.

(via turianbadboy)

(via silvysartfulness)

melpomeni:

severusalways:

byzantienne:

sassy-shipper-kayk-summii:

circlique:

thats-so-uke:

SCREAMS LOUDLY

HOLY CRAP.

SCREECHES 

THIS IS AAMAZING.

a) there is an orchestral version of Gangnam Style; b) the orchestral version is AMAZING; c) the orchestral version kind of proves that Psy is an actual musical genius; d) not surprising, his degree’s from Berklee

+1 internets

(via silvysartfulness)

nethilia:

murdorito:

ankankimatank:

dollymacabre:

mszombi:

fleurdulys:

The Irritating Gentleman - Berthold Woltze

1874

I know that feel, Painting Lady. 

My bus ride to and from work every day.

They never published the second picture, which was the one where she backhanded him in the fucking face for getting all up in her shit.

Oh great, good to know this has been a problem for HUNDREDS OF YEARS CAN WE PLEASE STOP DOING THIS ALREADY JUST FUCK OFF AND LEAVE ME ALONE

Everyone is overlooking something very significant in this picture, that I saw in two seconds, that adds a layer of super slime to his whole awful attitude. “The Irritating Gentleman” is a politeness.

She’s wearing all black in 1874. Black gloves, hat, cloak, and dress. In public. The whole nine yards. That’s not a fashion choice or a gothic thing. Back then when people wore all black like that, they were in mourning for someone who died. No one did mourning like the Victorians, that shit was an art form to them.

Someone in her family has died—she could even be a young widow. No one’s accompanying her either. With the carpet bag? She’s traveling alone while still in deep mourning. Look at the closeup. She’s got tears in her eyes. She is upset, devastated in a way that one is only when someone has died. And the guy’s still bothering her, like her problems are flippant bullshit and she needs to just smile or pay attention to him because ladies are supposed to be pleasing for men no matter what shit they’re going through. That’s not a look of “what an ass.” That’s a look of devastation that even in her pain, she’s expected to give people like him focus. She’s not mad. She’s hurt. And to add insult to injury? Everyone would be able to tell. It was a clear sign and still is in ways that someone is mourning, to dress in black crepe like that. He would know why she’s wearing all black, and he’s still demanding her attention.

What an insufferable dick.

At least I’m not the only one who saw this.

(via silvysartfulness)